Review of a scientific article on tourism. In our opinion, the work of Yu.A. Belchikov “The Origin and Formation of the Vocabulary of the Russian Language”, submitted for review, is a completed independent study, performed on a sufficient theoretical basis.
"The Origin and Formation of the Vocabulary of the Modern Russian Language"From the work of Doctor of Philology Yu.A. Belchikov, we can conclude that the chosen research topic is relevant for modern Russian society. An analysis of the problem shows that the vocabulary of the Russian language has come a long way of becoming, that our vocabulary consists not only of iconic Russian words, but also of words borrowed from other languages. The theme of borrowing foreign words by the Russian language in different eras was also reflected in the history of our people. What is the novelty of the author's approach in the study of economic, political, cultural contacts with other countries that leave their mark on the development of the language.The scientific work submitted for review has, of course, practical significance and rational construction.
The author uses a modern approach to research technology. Along with traditional research methods, the professor uses an integrated approach that combines qualitative and quantitative research methods. Qualitative methods are presented by interviews, quantitative ones - by questioning.I would like to note the positive aspects of the research work: the problem of the formation of the vocabulary of the Russian language in different periods of time was studied; an attempt was made to study the state of the vocabulary of the modern Russian language throughout the entire process of its historical formation; theoretically substantiated the need for work to replenish the original Russian vocabulary, created on the basis of the word-formation resources of the language, as a result of a wide variety of processes characteristic of Russian word formation.
In our opinion, the work of Yu.A. Belchikov “The Origin and Formation of the Vocabulary of the Russian Language”, submitted for review, is a completed independent study, performed at a sufficient theoretical and methodological level, and has an innovative character.
- How well does the abstract summarize the article, the problems, methods, results, and importance presented? For example, it may be that the abstract describes the topic of a pharmaceutical study, followed immediately by the results without a detailed discussion of the study methods.
- Does the introduction set the structure of the entire article? Does it clearly state the main points? A good introduction gives you a clear idea of what to expect from the following sections. It may contain a problem and a hypothesis, briefly describe all research methods, and also report whether it was possible to confirm the initial assumption.
Evaluate references and literature review in the article. Most journal articles provide an overview of the existing literature on the topic, with references to previous scientific work in the text. Determine the reliability of the sources cited by the author, the level of consideration of other works and knowledge of the topic. Does the author analyze authoritative works or simply list famous names?
- If necessary, study the texts cited by the author of the article in order to better understand the existing literature on this topic.
- A good review of the literature contains the following statements: "In a 2015 authoritative study, Smith and Jones demonstrated treatment success in men and women. However, they did not study the results and safety of this method in children and adolescents. This issue will be the main issue of this article."
Learn the methods. Think: “Are these methods reasonable, acceptable approaches to solving a problem?”. Present other possible ways of preparing for the experiment or designing the study, and also indicate possible improvements that could be used by the authors.
- For example, it may be noted that the subjects of this medical study are not a representative sample of the population.
Evaluate the way the data and results are presented in the article. Determine the effectiveness of all tables, diagrams, symbols and other visual aids. Evaluate the literacy of the presentation and interpretation of the data obtained in the results and discussion sections. How useful or inappropriate are tables and charts?
- For example, it may turn out that the tables contain a lot of chaotic data that is not analyzed in any way in the text of the article.
Consider non-scientific evidence and data analysis. In the case of the humanitarian topic of the article, evaluate how well the facts are presented, designed to support the statement. How relevant is such evidence? Did the author convincingly interpret and analyze the given facts?
Article review. Review sample.
The review should include the following information:
1. Full title of the article, position and full name. the author of the article. Example:
REVIEW of the article “Control Functions in Teaching a Foreign Language (FL) to Students of Technical Specialties” by Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages of St. Petersburg State Pedagogical University Tatiana Vasilyevna (Kushnareva T.V.), published in the journal “Philological Sciences. Issues of theory and practice” for 2013, No. 4, pp. 32-41.
2. A brief description of the problem to which the article is devoted. Example:
Article by T.V. Kushnareva is devoted to the definition of the main functions and rules of education and the importance of their observance when organizing the control of knowledge, skills and abilities in foreign language of students of technical specialties at the university.
3. The degree of relevance of the article. Example:
The relevance of this article is not in doubt, since testing and assessing the knowledge, skills and abilities of students of technical specialties (TS) at the university is not only an important, but also a necessary part of the educational process, and mastering the method of testing knowledge is one of the problematic tasks, standing in front of the teacher today.
The author has carried out serious work to determine the functions of feedback or control in teaching foreign language to students of technical specialties. It is also important that T.V. Kushnareva writes about the need to change the role of the teacher in the process of teaching foreign language to TS students, since today the teacher at the university ceases to be the main source of information - he should rather direct the learning, and not manage the process of transferring the language information necessary to students in an authoritarian style.
5. Key article orientation. Example:
Article by T.V. Kushnareva "Control functions in teaching a foreign language to students of technical specialties" calls for thinking about the effectiveness of oral and written dialogue with students and ways to check the level of knowledge they have gained in the classroom in foreign language by questioning, testing, preparing scientific reports for lectures or free (but within the framework of the studied subject) topic.
6. Conclusions made by the reviewer after reading the article. Example:
The article may be useful not only for teachers of higher educational institutions, but also for secondary educational institutions of a technical profile - technical schools, colleges, and schools. It will also seem interesting to students studying a foreign language at a university. Students can learn from the article important information for themselves about various forms of control over the assimilation of the studied material and even help the teacher of foreign languages in the future to choose from the presented means the most effective for themselves.
7. Grade, date, some data about the reviewer, the student's signature under the review. Example:
Article by T.V. Kushnareva "Functions of control in teaching a foreign language to students of technical specialties" deserves the highest praise, since the author in it does not present the problems of mastering a foreign language abstracted from studies, but the living practice of real teaching a foreign language at a university based on eighteen years of experience in conducting classes with students of different courses and faculties of higher education.
September 9, 2013 Reviewer - Stepanov N.I., 4th year student of group 4334 of the Faculty of Information Technology and Management of St. Petersburg State Pedagogical University.
The relevance of this study is...
As the main points of the methodology used by the author...
The article analyzes the main approaches...
The article identifies and discloses the main problems ...
Important in the article is the consideration ...
This article demonstrates...
That is why this paper focuses on...
The positive side of the job is...
On a positive note,...
The material of the article is based on a detailed analysis...
It should be emphasized that...
The article focuses on...
Of particular interest is the...
Deserves special attention...
The practical significance of this article lies in ...
The proposed approach to studying the problem...
The original concept discussed in the article...
The work under review is a serious and interesting article on a rather rare topic...
It should be noted that this article reveals a number of interesting aspects ...
The article contains a certain concept, the essence of which ...
The theoretical significance of this article lies in ...
The work under review is distinguished by the novelty and evidence of a number of ideas...
The sources cited in this article reflect the modern point of view on the problem under study, the essence of which ...
The article is made at a high scientific level, contains a number of conclusions of practical interest for…
For many university students, graduate students and researchers, the issue of writing various papers is quite problematic. In particular, it can be difficult to take into account all the requirements and competently write a review of the publication. Today I decided to post information about how to write a review of a scientific article, an example of which can be seen below.
What is a review
Before publishing an article in a serious publication, a review is required. At the same time, peer review is considered one of the most important parts in the selection and approval of works. In addition, it improves the quality of published articles.
To publish an article in a journal from the VAK List, at least two reviews are required. A number of publications that are preparing to submit documents to be included in this list have the same requirements. However, such reviews are also required for other purposes in the framework of higher education and the submission of scientific publications. This applies to both humanitarian and technical specialties, and introduces difficulties for both students, for example, undergraduates, and researchers.
Some people think the term “peer review” is intricate, but it can be described quite simply: the article is checked for consistency and authenticity of the content, as well as for compliance with the design requirements. However, such a simple procedure is associated with the subjective discretion of the reviewers. Therefore, you need to know exactly how to properly draw up a document, and what it should contain.
A review is a special document that is compiled by a reviewer.. The latter may be a scholar with a degree who understands the content of the publication, and also works in the same field, specializes in the same discipline as the author.
The reviewer provides a brief analysis of the publication, evaluation. All this is done according to specific criteria. They also evaluate the volume, annotation, the choice of keywords in different languages. They also look at how well the references are written, how the bibliography is framed.
Varieties of reviews
Depending on the purpose of compilation, the document can be written by different reviewers. It comes in the following varieties:
- Internal review compiled by the supervisor. The teacher's signature certifies the university or the institution where the author is studying or working.
- External review– for this purpose, editors of journals or members of the editorial board are appointed as reviewers. One way or another, the document should be compiled by specialists with authority and a scientific degree. A number of organizations require the person who will write it to have published publications in specialized journals over the past few years (usually for three years).
Sample drafting plan
There are two options for a plan on how to write a review of an article. The first option can be called simplified, and the second one is already somewhat more complicated and more detailed. If you are interested in a simpler plan that allows you to understand how to write a review competently, then it includes the following points:
- Introduction about the subject of research.
- Personal impressions about reading, the main aspects that shape the course of publication.
- Degree of importance the problem that is being highlighted.
- findings.
This plan is better students and novice reviewers who do not have enough experience to write criticisms.
The expanded plan would look like this:
- Intelligence about the article in question.
- Degree of importance problems and their updating.
- Indication of the main aspect under consideration in the publication (a brief analysis of the content is possible).
- Custom Arguments and impressions from the study.
- Constructive criticism and negative sides.
- findings.
Volume
The question of volume is ambiguous, since this nuance will largely depend on the specific topic and scientific discipline. Usually a review takes up to three and a half thousand printed characters. This corresponds to approximately 1.5 pages of 12 point Word text.
To give your review a stylistic finish, be sure to use special phrases and thematic expressions that emphasize your professionalism and knowledge of the subject and discipline.
Concise Dictionary of Phrases
If you want to write a good review, use the following words and sentences, which can be inserted into the text:
- In the article of the author or in the work ...
- Scientific research is devoted to the following problem ...
- An important aspect of the article, in which the author achieved a positive result ...
- Summing up the results of the entire study or its separate part ...
- You can point out the imperfection of the article in that ...
In the last paragraph, it is important to say not only about the shortcomings, but also about the positive aspects of the publication.
Add the following phrase: “However, it is impossible not to say about … ”
What should a reviewer be guided by?
If you want to do everything right, adhere to special rules for compiling a document. In this case, your review will be accepted in a specialized publication. When writing a review, pay attention to the following requirements:
- Describing the importance of the topic in modern conditions and its relevance, do it as concisely as possible.
- Pointing to the main aspect, choose the thesis that you consider the main, without additional and secondary nuances.
- When retelling the content, remember to point out the findings of the study and focus on successful thesis of the author.
- Pointing out the negative sides, write exclusively on topic without citing additional sources.
- In the closing phrases talk about the positives.
- Mandatory tell me about dates and exact facts, but without compromising the clarity and brevity of the document.
As additional requirements for which feedback should be made, you can use the following:
- Point out the originality of the publication.
- List the main shortcomings and your criticisms.
- Tell about your personal impressions while reading a scientific work, but do it with arguments.
- Be impartial and try to be objective.
- It is also recommended to personally communicate with the author.
If you comply with the above requirements, your review will be accepted for publication in a magazine or for posting on a website, etc.
What is not allowed when writing a review
In addition to the mandatory items, there are also certain points that should never appear in the text, namely:
- Never do not write swear words or radical appeals with a violent nature.
- Do not simply retell the text research, as readers can do it, but never critics and people with special training.
- Not allowed to turn on personal opinion without argument.
- Do not write lengthy abstract reasoning.
- Always express thoughts clearly and do not pay too much attention to the nuances that can be counted secondary.
- The unpreparedness of the reviewer, the presence spelling and factual errors.
- Do not write exclusively in a negative spirit, point out the positives as well.
- Don't write about personal tastes and preferences.
Pay attention to these points, and you will not be accused of illiteracy or bias.
Writing a review is easy: criteria for content
When writing to begin with, indicate the overall rating of the article. It will consist of several criteria, each of which can be assessed as “sufficient”, “weak”, “insufficient” and included in the text. The criteria will be as follows:
- Problematic. The study should be devoted to a particular issue and indicate its essence, point to solutions.
- Relevance. The article should correspond to modern scientific and social realities.
- Scientific. The author must consider the subject of research from the point of view of a scientist, even if it is in itself applied and technical.
- Novelty. The results and conclusions reached by the author must have scientific novelty. It may also consist in the application of new methods that have not previously been used when considering a particular topic.
- Completeness. Research must be holistic. So, the author needs to start with setting goals and goals, and complete the text with their solution.
- Validity. The result must be substantiated using certain tools - specific methods, experiments, mathematical modeling, etc.
- Structured. The article should have a clear and understandable structure, which in publications corresponds to the presence of sections and subsections. They can be devoted to relevance, analysis of facts and theories, problem statement, discussion in scientific circles and literature, conclusion, etc.
- Characteristics of the formulations. The provisions of the publication should be formulated as clear, concise phrases and strictly define the essence of the contribution of the research to science and the development of the discipline.
- Clarity. Articles should be written in a language that will be understandable to average specialists in a particular field. The use of generally accepted terms is required.
- Compactness. Scientific work should not be excessively voluminous. The size of the text is regulated by the content of clear, verified information in it.
After evaluating these criteria, substantive comments can also be included. For more tips, check out the following video:
Review example
Today, a ready-made sample document can be downloaded for free. Here is an example of a short review of a publication in the field of psychology. Recall that this is only an approximate example, and you can (and most likely even should!) Include additional sub-clauses depending on the specific topic. So the text might be:
- Review of the article “Psychological Aspects of Education in School Institutions” by post-graduate student of the Department of Psychology of the Pedagogical University, Lapushkina Natalya Vasilievna.
- The article discusses the main psychological aspects that are aimed at improving the academic performance and learning ability of children at school, conducts a behavioral analysis of specific groups of schoolchildren by age.
- The relevance of the problem under study is beyond doubt, because the current level of schooling lags far behind the realities of the time, and to a large extent this depends on the illiterate approach of teachers to students.
- The author did a deep work and provided recommendations regarding the normalization of the psychological climate in educational institutions. There is a conclusion that the psychological knowledge of teachers is insufficient, and teachers are unwilling to seek contact with children.
- The scientific article fully complies with a number of requirements and can be recommended for publication.
- Full name of the reviewer, other personal information, signature and seal.
Fig.1 Sample review of a scientific article. Click to view in full size... Finally
Writing a review is a problematic procedure, since it can be difficult not only for undergraduate or graduate students, but also for serious scientists, to clearly articulate their opinion on a study and express it in a few pages. Such documents are compiled both for approval of the publication of the article, and for internal use in the defense of diplomas, term papers, for the implementation of student projects, and also simply as training for university students.
The writing process can be made much easier if you follow a specific plan and write your own assessment, according to the criteria. The finished sample also helps to determine the wording.
Legal advice free of charge online
Fill out the form to ask your question:2. A brief description of the problem to which the article is devoted.
3. The degree of relevance of the provided article.
4. The most important aspects disclosed by the author in the article.
6. Academic title, academic degree, position, place of work, full name reviewer, seal, signature.
- The author in his work gives a detailed analysis ...
- The author analyzes...
- The author of this article focuses on...
- The author demonstrates a high level of knowledge in the field of...
- The author proves with concrete examples...
- The author, based on a large amount of factual material, considers ...
- The author points out that...
- The author rightly points out...
- The author successfully argues his own point of view ...
- The author offers original ideas...
- The relevance of this study is...
- As the main points of the methodology used by the author...
- In the article, the author considers...
- The article analyzes the main approaches...
- The article identifies and discloses the main problems ...
- Important in the article is the consideration ...
- All content of the article is logically interconnected and confirmed by quotations from authoritative sources.
- This article demonstrates...
- The author has studied (presented, outlined, described) in sufficient detail...
- That is why this paper focuses on...
- The sources cited in this article reflect the modern point of view on the problem under study.
- The positive side of the job is...
- On a positive note,...
- The material of the article is based on a detailed analysis...
- It should be emphasized that...
- Particular attention in the study ... is paid to ...
- Of particular interest is the...
- Deserves special attention...
- The practical significance of this article lies in ...
- The proposed approach to studying the problem...
- The original concept discussed in the article...
- The work under review is a serious and interesting scientific article on a rather rare topic...
- The work under review is distinguished by the novelty and evidence of a number of ideas.
- It should be noted that this scientific article reveals a number of interesting aspects ...
- The article is made at a high scientific level, contains a number of conclusions of practical interest.
- The article contains a certain concept ...
- The theoretical significance of this article lies in ...
